Bechdel test

Revision as of 11:03, 22 September 2015 by Anahita (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Dykes to Watch Out For (Bechdel test origin)

The Bechdel test is a test that evaluates movies and other media for a bare-minimum standard of women's presence and characterization/interaction. As such, it can be seen as a measure of how sexist a story is and/or how sexist the creators of the medium are. The test originates from cartoonist Alison Bechdel's strip Dykes to Watch Out For,[1], specifically from her 1985 strip entitled The Test.

The eponymous test states that a movie is not worth watching unless:

  1. It has two female characters in it,
  2. that talk together about something,
  3. other than a man.

These criteria may seem easy to fullfill, but films that fail this benchmark are not only common, but systematically encouraged in film schools and through targeted-demographic marketing[2].


The Bechdel test is held up as a very simple lowest-bar-possible threshold for feminist media criticism because it addresses several misrepresentations and under-representations of women:

  • Media that includes no female characters at all is obviously not inclusive of women, and media that includes only one token female character demands she embody all possibilities for women while her male cohorts are allowed to be flawed and diverse[3].
  • Women, and female characters, are often made to compete or are otherwise segregated in writing such that there is no possibility for bonding or fellowship between them [4].
  • Women who do not talk or only exist to deliver a particular message to a man might as well be sexy lamps rather than people.
  • Finally, men, male approval, and the male gaze are often the motivating goal of a female character, otherwise they are presented as an artifact in a man's story[5]. So two female characters that only exist as rhetorical devices to talk about a male character, will thus serve that male character's arc rather than their own.

As completely basic as the Bechdel test's terms are, a disproportionate amount of films do not pass the baseline set out by this test[6].


Because the Bechdel Test was coined in a specific context; it may not be suitable to analyze all media. Specifically, it does not take into account if a medium is being produced by a woman, and is thus a woman's voice in of itself. It does not factor in the presence of nonbinary or genderqueer characters. And in addition it might not be perfectly applicable to interactive, non-visual, or other forms of media different from film.

For example, if an interactive novel or video game allows you to pick the main character's gender, that media might pass and not pass the Bechdel test at the very same time. Alternatively, media that passes the Bechdel test might have other misogynist elements that otherwise contravene the spirit, but not the letter, of the test. For example. if the female characters in question are then reduced to tools in a man's story arc, killed off for shock value, or otherwise punished.

The test itself is also not intersectional. In other words, it does not distinguish if only white women are talking to each other, or if women of all races, genders, sexualities, shapes and bodies, etc., are represented in a respectful and appropriate way, both as characters and in terms casting.

See also

External links


  1. Dykes to Watch Out For, by Alison Bechdel
  2. Why Film Schools Teach Writers Not to Pass the Bechdel Test, by Jennifer Kesler.
  3. Hers: The Smurfette Principle, by Katha Pollitt
  4. Mean Girls: Cattiness in Media Pits Women Against Each Other, by Megan Kearns, with additional citations of works by Vanessa Carmichael, Cheryl Dellasega, and Susan J. Douglas.
  5. We're Losing All our Strong Female Characters to Trinity Syndrome, by Tasha Robinson.
  6. Silk's analysis of 1500 films for passing the Bechdel Test, presented on Upworthy.
Other languages: