...rg/stable/685952 Theory of integrative levels. The British Journal For The Philosophy Of Science, 5(17), 59-66.]</ref>
998 bytes (151 words) - 05:01, 10 December 2014
[[Category:Philosophy]]
72 bytes (7 words) - 05:02, 10 December 2014
...logical%20positivism&f=false A Passion for Wisdom: A Very Brief History of Philosophy], by Robert C. Solomon, Kathleen M. Higgins</ref> is a toxic ideology, many
3 KB (405 words) - 04:00, 2 July 2015
.../richard-dawkins-would-fail-philosophy-101.html Richard Dawkins Would Fail Philosophy 101], by Elizabeth Picciuto</ref>
277 bytes (30 words) - 04:00, 2 July 2015
[[Category:Philosophy]]
123 bytes (11 words) - 04:00, 2 July 2015
<blockquote>Philosophy is the activity by means of which the meaning of statements is clarified an
276 bytes (40 words) - 04:00, 2 July 2015
*[http://www.iep.utm.edu/rawls/ Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy on Rawls]
239 bytes (31 words) - 04:00, 2 July 2015
...he only truth is that which can be reached via the scientific method, that philosophy has no role within science, and that science does not require moral or ethi
3 KB (341 words) - 04:00, 2 July 2015
...Professor of Health Law, Medicine Michael A. Grodin Associate Professor of Philosophy and Associate Director of Law, and Ethics Program both of the Boston Univer
2 KB (315 words) - 04:00, 2 July 2015
...66.]</ref>. Nevertheless, logical positivism was a major force in analytic philosophy from the 1920s forward until philosophers such as Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn,
958 bytes (145 words) - 04:00, 2 July 2015
[[category:Philosophy]]
126 bytes (12 words) - 04:01, 2 July 2015
Scientism, by marginalising the contributions of philosophy, becomes self-annihilating and internally inconsistent because it presuppos
824 bytes (120 words) - 04:01, 2 July 2015
.../entries/logical-empiricism/ Logical Empiricism], Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</ref> states that:
876 bytes (118 words) - 04:01, 2 July 2015
...positions. That is not to say that science cannot inform certain areas of philosophy, but Harris' neo-positivist and scientismist approach to ethics is faulty a
506 bytes (79 words) - 04:01, 2 July 2015
...The Social Dimensions of Scientific Knowledge], Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
2 KB (223 words) - 04:01, 2 July 2015
===Philosophy===
...long to [[philosophy]]. Scientism takes science to be not only better than philosophy at answering such questions, but the ''only'' means of answering them.|||Au
2 KB (298 words) - 04:01, 2 July 2015
...se-tyson-and-the-value-of-philosophy/ Neil deGrasse Tyson and the value of philosophy], by Massimo Pigliucci</ref>
...nother-physicist-with.html Lawrence Krauss: another physicist with an anti-philosophy complex], by Massimo Pigliucci</ref>
2 KB (294 words) - 04:01, 2 July 2015
...l positivism]] (an almost identical, although less extreme version of this philosophy) failed. As such it is completely self-annihilating,<ref name="philbasics">
731 bytes (104 words) - 04:01, 2 July 2015
...and people of color are not proportionately represented in modern academic philosophy <ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEr-xXHVjKk</ref>.
261 bytes (41 words) - 04:01, 2 July 2015
...digm shifts]]. In other words, scientism supporters fail to understand the philosophy of science at its basic level and instead reveal themselves to be ignorant
628 bytes (92 words) - 04:01, 2 July 2015